Showing posts with label Hulu. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hulu. Show all posts

Sunday, February 13, 2022

Looking for a Fountain of Mirth

In the aftermath of a twelve-year stretch of life that seamlessly moved from one form of confinement to another like the baton hand off of an Olympic relay team, I need to laugh. Bad. I search like Ponce de Leon for a fountain of, if not quite youth, mirth.

While de Leon reportedly discovered his fountain in St. Augustine, FL. I discovered mine on Peacock. And Hulu.

The first blast o' laughs were provided by Peacock and the raucously brilliant Girls5eva.

Produced (among others) by Tina Fey, it is a note-perfect symphony of four middle-aged women seeking to re-capture their oh-so-brief brush with fame they enjoyed as a girl group. Their earnest but forlorn plans evoke pathos, but never without a sturdy undercurrent of humor.

Flawlessly performed by Sara Bareilles, Busy Philipps, Paula Pell and Renee Elise Goldsberry, the laughs (both obvious and not-so-obvious) arrive like a full-force blizzard. Woe unto those who dare sleep on even a single sentence.

Next up is American Auto. Produced by Justin Spitzer (The Office, Superstore), it evokes the same cringe worthy moments we saw on The Office, where awkward t-bones dim and together, they careen into head-in-hands disbelief.

In other words, imagine an executive suite populated by not one, but four Michael Scotts. Be it a new model reveal, a recall or just shooting a commercial, watching the executives at Payne Motors is a highly entertaining master's class in WTF.

They collectively drive American Auto (sorry) just short of the cliff. And I wouldn't have it any other way.

As with Girls5eva, plans for a second season are unknown.

Finally, there's Dating #No Filter.

I'm normally not a fan of reality shows. They're fake and cruel and as a confirmed snowflake, that is not how I roll. 

So. Here's the format. Decide for yourselves. 

Three team of comedians watch video of couples on blind dates. Snappy commentary and hilarity ensue. It's a bit like Mystery Science Theater 3000 meets Awkward Dating Videos—if that were a show.

The oftentimes hapless participants are left to puzzle out these strange encounters for themselves. Yes, there is some snark. It gets a little catty. But more often than not, D#NF's narrators are pulling for a love connection, giving the show the heart so many others lack.

As with Girls5eva and American Auto, I'm even able to watch three or four episodes back-to-back, which is as binge-y as I get. (This because otherwise, formulas get revealed. Plots get predictable. Episodes grow stale like bread left out overnight.)

And the goal is, after all, to laugh. Remember?

Especially mirthful is the team of Kelsey Darragh and Zach Noe Towers. They animatedly riff on whatever date is in session, poking fun at themselves as often as the participants. Their mix of irony, self-deprecation and utter inhibition is a winning one.

Also worthy of mention is the team of Nina Parker and Cara Conners. Together, they offer a perspective that is equal parts common sense and undeniable truth. Parker in particular is only too happy to call out some of the outsized egos here, be they male or female.

So yeah. It's a good laugh. All of them are.

See you in the funny papers.


Saturday, February 6, 2021

Watching TV the Roku Way

All of us have been told in one form or another “get with the program”. It might have happened at work or in some aspect of our personal lives, but all of us have been advised at some point to conform and stop being difficult.

Sometimes, it even comes from within.

I have described my dislike of twenty-first century cable TV many times. The ever-spiralling cost of watching blocks of decades-old programming while being repeatedly subjected to the water torture of five-minute commercial breaks had burrowed beneath my skin and was beginning to itch. Badly.

But I kept it. As I saw it, streaming was a chain with many more links and hence, more-prone to breakdown, malfunction and so on. And in the end, was it really any cheaper?

An October price-hike from my cable provider pushed me over the edge. Spotty reliability, shrinking Internet bandwidth and the fact that it had become my largest non-housing-related monthly expense drove me to dump them.

(My most-damning indictment of AT&T is that their's was the only business phone number I knew by heart. I'll leave it to your supple imaginations to puzzle-out why.)

So. There I stood, perched on the precipice of twenty-first century television technology! I was going to stream! Watch Netflix! Have access to all of the fascinating and groundbreaking programming I'd been hearing about, appearing nightly on my TV!

Hoo Boy!

If I have a failing, it's that I allow myself to be carried away by stuff. Despite my robust cynicism, I—at times—believe the hype. And my first foray into this brave new world was no exception.

On the advice of a relative far-more conversant in TV tech than I, I ventured online and bought a Roku device. All was well until it arrived. The initial set-up was simple, as promised. The problem started when I attempted to connect it with my WiFi.

Even despite forty minutes on the phone with a certified Roku tech and another foray under the viral hood of my Internet to confirm the password, nothing. The Roku device steadfastly refused to play nice.

The tech concluded it had to be defective and urged me to initiate an exchange.

In 2021 this is not generally a difficult thing to do. Unless one is working with Roku. Since they claim their customer service telephone number had been deactivated because of COVID, I was left to navigate their cumbersome e-mail system.

Even with the confirmation of one of their own, the exchange took three business days to approve. If that weren't enough, Roku was asking me to foot the bill for the return.

I was not made glad.

I informed them I no longer wanted to exchange the device but return it outright. Shockingly, this was okayed in just twenty-four hours.

I dropped it off at the local post office in a USPS Priority mailer. On the same day the post office confirmed its delivery in San Jose, California, I received another Roku device in the mail.

First, let me acknowledge that consumer expectations are much higher in 2021 than they were in, say, 1991. Computerization has shortened processing and delivery timelines as well as consumer's patience.

As a (mostly) sympathetic consumer, I will also acknowledge that not all customers are responsible. We twenty-first Americans have learned well from the business and political classes and are quite adept at gaming the system—even if it's at a level far below that of the aforementioned populations.

While the wonders of online shopping are touted far and wide, there's a dark side: the rate of return for items purchased online is four times what it is for items purchase in-store, proving conclusively that nothing beats having a potential purchase in hand.

And those returns impact profitability. Someone, somewhere is paying for it. (My guess is that company's mid-to-lower-level employees. No surprise there.)

I am not a capricious shopper. I buy only after examining and re-examining every facet of the item I'm considering—especially clothing. I don't wantonly order three different sizes in four different colors thinking I'll just return whatever doesn't fit or that I don't like.

But I am in a minority. So if companies were to raise the threshold on returns I would—to a point—understand.

But this was different. I had a defective unit confirmed by one of the manufacturer's own technicians. I wasn't returning the device because it didn't match the drapes. Why was I paying to return it?

With the receipt of a unit I hadn't wanted or requested, I was now quite angry. I fired-off a heated e-mail to Roku expressing my displeasure. I graciously offered them two choices: either pay the postage for the second device's return or let me have it free of charge.

That was over a week ago. Their sole communication in that time had been an e-mail telling me they hadn't received the original unit.

Yep.

Their re-enactment of Dumb and Dumber was nerve-wracking. The glacial pace of their processing a no-brainer of a return jaw-dropping. I'll put this as clinically as I can, but it was clear to me I was having sexual intercourse with a vagina made of sandpaper.

I mean, this was not going well. I called my credit card company. And as I was on the phone detailing this transaction to them an e-mail appeared from Roku.

They had confirmed the device's return and were now initiating the refund process.

Problem solved, right?

Two days later (which happened to be the three-week anniversary of this calamity), I received another e-mail from Roku. This one asked when I was going to respond and advised me that if I failed to do so within three days the file would be closed and marked 'resolved'.

If you ask how bad something can get you will inevitably find out.

Since when does a two-sentence e-mail that consists of a greeting and an announcement that they have begun their refund process need to be responded to? What's more, the company that had been dragging its feet for three-weeks was giving me deadlines? Seriously?

I complied and re-stated the obvious and added that, yes, I was still interested in a refund and that nothing had changed. (Sometimes my sense of humor can be remarkably subtle.) That was over a week ago.

On a call to my credit card company, I was informed that in our business-friendly country, businesses have up to ten days to issue a refund. Why? It's probable that corporate lawyers are oilier and sneakier and better manipulators than government lawyers.

With today being day number-ten, I sprang from my bed and opened my credit card account to scan for the long-promised refund.

Nothing.

I dialed the phone. “Hello, credit card company? I'd like to dispute a charge.”