At
this point in the run-up to the presidential election, we're hearing
lots and lots about the undecideds. But who are they? At a time when
the political divide is as great as its ever been, how do these folk
remain betwixt and between in a race featuring two such starkly different
candidates?
Do
they see something we don't? Or are they only more confused?
I mean, even
as a Democrat I don't embrace everything espoused by progressives. Here are some examples.
The
cancel culture? Nope. My hesitation reached critical mass when the
idea was floated that John Muir, the esteemed naturalist who provided
the impetus to develop the national park system lest
these jewels be forever despoiled by runaway capitalism, be castigated
and denounced as a racist.
Okay.
Does that mean we pull the plug on our national parks system as well,
since the idea is inevitably tainted since it sprung from the mind of a
racist? And what of Thomas Edison and the cornucopia of inventions
that originated from his (presumably) racist mind?
Do
we renounce both the man and his contributions? I mean, how far do we
take this?
And
what of democracy itself? Since it was shaped in part by slave
owners, do we renounce not only those who took part but democracy itself? Do we comb the history of medicine and renounce not only the
discoveries, inventions and vaccines of anything fouled with the whiff of racism but their creators as well?
Do
we scour the classical music repertoire and forbid pieces composed by
anyone with a trace of any kind of “ism” to be recorded or
performed?
I
could go and and on. You probably could as well. Like so many
well-intentioned thoughts, this is an idea that should have stayed an
idea and never, ever made it to thing-hood.
Defunding
the police? My
first response was are you serious? You mean we're all grown-ups
and/or are ably provided with that which we need to exist and
contribute to the greater good without that irksome distraction of
poverty?
Sadly,
we are not even close to either ideal. And interpretations of this
policy are as widespread as our political spectrum.
They
range from Ariel Atkins' pathetic justification that the looting of
Chicago's Michigan Avenue merchants last May and August meant that
her people were going to “get paid.” You mean none of those folk
are employed or receiving any kind of aid whatsoever, Ariel? Because
several had the wherewithal to rent U-Haul trucks to stash those pilfered goods from Gucci and Cartier and Tiffany.
Adding that the
police needed to be destroyed to your mindless diatribe contrasts greatly with more-reasoned constructs that
perhaps instead of endlessly arming our police with more and more
weaponry, we need to better enable those institutions which cope with
mental health, addiction and homelessness and would likely lessen the
load on police.
Hmmm.
Okay. I can sign-off on that.
And
before I move on, let me make one crazy, wild and stupidly-naive
suggestion: beat cops. You know, cops on foot patrolling a
neighborhood. People we recognize. Get to know. And who recognize and
get to know us. People we have a relationship with.
Which
is pretty much the opposite of 'stranger'. Which is the relationship
we currently have with cops. And which cops currently have with us.
And
we all know how easy it is to demonize/threaten/hate on/stigmatize
strangers, right?
Like
I said, just a suggestion.
Finally,
let me toss one more issue out there: sanctuary cities.
I empathize mightily with the plight of the immigrant. Especially
those seeking to escape violent hell-holes like Honduras or El
Salvador. Providing them with asylum is nothing less than the
fulfillment of our highest ideals.
And
yet, not every immigrant is a political refugee, are they? Many are
here illegally. And be they an asshole who lives in a white house and wears red ties or someone sleeping in an abandoned
car while they attempt to find work unloading a produce truck at 3
AM, I am not especially fond of law-breakers.
And
sanctuary cities essentially seem to be a reward for not being
caught. And I'm not very fond of that, either.
The
United States of America has a very schizophrenic relationship with
immigrants, and the faster we can develop a holistic, comprehensive
policy regarding them the better off we'll be. The extreme capitalism
so many labor under is only serving the marketplace, and I thought we
were better than that.
Aren't
we?
So
yeah, I'm not as knee-jerk a Democrat as the folk in the DNC would
like.
But
my skin begins to crawl when I consider the options. Libertarians? We
already have one, thank you very much. The "official" party of Trump? Pence?
McConnell? Graham? Barr? Barrett? Are you fucking serious?
Repulsed
by two parties, mildly enthused by another. So it seems destined to
be.
As
Republicants so well know, we often vote out of fear. I fear Crazy
Don and his plans to delete Medicare and Social Security and speed
our decent into a hybrid mix of feudalism and oligarchy. The lies. The chaos. The ignorance.
At
his willingness to destroy and manipulate anything to remain
in power, and the brain-damaged folk who applaud this.
Huh?
This is our law and order president? Really?
Speaking
for myself, despite my party affiliation I am voting against Donald
Trump and not for Joe Biden. My contempt for Trump overwhelms any certainty I could possess that Biden is the best
choice going forward.
Most
importantly at this juncture, he's not the worst.
Perhaps
the undecided are people not interested in voting against a
candidate, but people looking to vote out of hope.
Which
might be why they're having such a tough time.