Oscar
Wilde once said something to the effect that the worst thing in life
was to be ignored. Obviously,
Mr. Wilde was never the target of a computer hacker.
While
the repeated hacks were bad enough, seeking help was even more
excruciating. If I didn't already possess abundant sympathy for the
budding Olympic gymnasts under the care of Larry Nassar, I did now.
After
several incidents in early-August, I sought help via the courts. The
hacking had started when the person I suspected and myself were
friends. Now that we no longer were, what was he capable of?
I
petitioned the court for a Stalking No Contact order. In preliminary
phone calls, I explained the situation and my concerns and did not
exaggerate them in any way. I was assured mine was an entirely viable
case.
I
should mention that my questions had been referred to a shelter for
battered and abused women.
Which
wouldn't be significant except for the fact my wife had suffered a
fall four days earlier. And when the resulting hematoma drained into
her eye socket a day and a half later, it gave her the appearance of
someone who had been struck in the eye.
So
when my wife and I arrived to file the order, attention immediately
shifted to her. And then to me. Since I am eight inches taller and a
hundred pounds heavier than my wife, you can guess the assumptions.
Fortunately,
I was able to show a staffer the urgent text and photograph my wife's
care-giver had sent me the morning of her fall, asking me to call
home ASAP. This put to rest everyone's concerns.
The
fun continued when I was asked to fill out an online form. It was
written in government-ese, which is a language I continue to struggle
with. So when the form asked when the stalking began, I listed the
date I learned who my stalker slash hacker was, which was over a year ago.
The
form then asked for the two-most recent events, which I obediently
supplied.
A court clerk downloaded and printed the complaint and assigned it a case
number. Then we waited for the judge.
I
am fortunate to have had very little contact with judges. This means
I have never been accused of a crime, been sued nor had to sue or accuse another. And
given the choice, is unquestionably the way I prefer it.
So
when the deputy arrived to escort us to our meeting, we followed
with the kind of hope only the truly innocent can harbor.
We
were led to a small conference room with a high ceiling. The walls were covered with curtains, the kind of which you'd see in an exhibition hall. There were a dozen rows of grey padded
banquet chairs and a projector in the
back. A small table with a lectern stood in the front.
Ironically, the overhead lighting created more shadows than light.
We took seats in the first row and waited. Judge Joel Berg entered, sat down and scanned the first page of the request. Then the attack began.
Ironically, the overhead lighting created more shadows than light.
We took seats in the first row and waited. Judge Joel Berg entered, sat down and scanned the first page of the request. Then the attack began.
Visibly
irritated, he looked at me and said “This was over a year ago!”
I explained the online form requested the date of the first
incident. That was it.
In
an unsuccessful attempt to turn an accusation into a question, he
barked “Why didn't you file sooner?”
I explained my ignorance of the No Contact option. That I had only heard of Orders of Protection, which dealt specifically with domestic abuse.
On it went. Every response seemed to aggravate him further. Huffing
and puffing and shaking his head, Berg flipped between the pages of the
print-out. He asked about the two most-recent incidents.
Like
the indignant callers I had dealt with in my former life as a call
center rep for a Baby Bell, he interrupted me half-way through my
answers. He was pissed.
This
was going so very wrong. And so very quickly. I was beginning to feel like the bad guy here.
When
my anger reached critical mass, I exploded. I raised my voice. I
talked over him. I gestured. I ceased addressing him as 'your honor'.
I
hoped my face was taut and menacing. That my eyes were as piercing as
lasers.
When
I'm this angry I usually become a foaming, inarticulate mass.
This time I was a guided missile of focus and outrage. I don't know
how I remained seated.
I
circled back to the central point in my argument and demanded an
answer. “Tell me how that happens, judge! Tell me!”
Before
our elevated testosterone levels had a chance to subside, Judge Berg barked
again.
“I
don't know who hacked your computer! And neither do you! Order is
denied!”
At
that moment, I felt as if I could push over a bus. Never mind a judge.
Yes, I
wanted to beat the crap out of him. I was shaking with rage.
Berg's words lingered for days.
I expected no help from my stalker.
I expected a great deal from the judge. And when I got nothing,
it only stands to reason I was frustrated and angry.
Such
is the burden of great expectations.
And
yet being treated the way I was merely for seeking help seems so
very, very wrong. I was as outraged as that Albuquerque cop
whose sleeve I had dared to tug on with my petty, insignificant and
worse—ignorant—request.
The judge felt I didn't have sufficient evidence. That this didn't constitute an emergency.
I suppose I should have apologized for not possessing video of my hacker doing his work.
The judge felt I didn't have sufficient evidence. That this didn't constitute an emergency.
I suppose I should have apologized for not possessing video of my hacker doing his work.
It
is said that cops and crooks know the law best. Since I am neither, I
should have also apologized for wasting the time of such vital resources.
I
had presented my problem honestly to the judge's gatekeepers and had
been allowed in. That was my fault?
Apparently.
So to those Olympic gymnasts, I offer my everlasting empathy. Unfortunately, I know exactly how you feel.