To
those of us in the ninety-nine percent, you are an insanely wealthy
man. While your ownership put an end to the century-long championship
drought, it has also overseen a renovation of Wrigley Field that
spouts revenue like those fountains in front of swanky Las Vegas hotels.
And
good for you. You are entirely within your rights to make as much
money from your businesses as humanly possible. Where
you go wrong is when you say “I don't have any more money.” You
understand how that sounds, right? It's a screaming, neon-lit definition of disingenuous.
I'm
sure each arm in your Cubs' kingdom has a budget and a profit and loss
statement, and after dropping 391 million on long-term contracts to
Jason Heyward, Yu Darvish, Tyler Chatwood and Craig Kimbrel your
wallet is pretty sore.
But
here's the thing. The Cubs aren't a quote-unquote business.
They're a civic institution. You just happen to be the current owner.
And when you say you don't have any more money, you are effectively cutting the heart out of it.
The
window is still open. These Cubs are young and in their
prime and just a savvy trade or two removed from contention. I'm
going to presume this isn't news to you. Otherwise, you wouldn't have
fired Joe Maddon.
And yet you've essentially told the three mainstays in your lineup that their time in Chicago has a sell-by date.
And yet you've essentially told the three mainstays in your lineup that their time in Chicago has a sell-by date.
Huh?
Inviting
some combination of Anthony Rizzo, Javier Baez and Kris Bryant to put
up their feet and stay awhile would accomplish two things: it would
destroy the notion you're ready to shred the championship-era Cubs
and begin another rebuild (not the wisest proposition as you prepare
to unveil your in-house cable channel) while proving you're still
interested in further burnishing the Cubs brand (not to mention your
own) with another title.
Are
you?
Based
on their 2019 contributions, three-fifths of your pitching staff
could be described as wobbly. Bullpen issues abound. And who's going
to play second base?
But
the folk who pay forty-bucks to park and munch on seven-dollar hot
dogs while swilling ten-dollar beer know these aren't insurmountable
problems. There's still plenty of gas in the tank and topping it off
for another run is just a savvy (there's that word again) trade or
two away.
I'm aware that Major League Baseball's interminable crawl to a decision regarding the Bryant case isn't helping.
I'm aware that Major League Baseball's interminable crawl to a decision regarding the Bryant case isn't helping.
But
you're putting out mixed signals. Where's the evidence of a clear,
decisive game plan? Is moving Will Venable from first-base coach to
third-base coach what GM Theo Epstein meant by a “reckoning”? Are
you tearing down and preparing to rebuild or are you reloading?
Nothing
foments restlessness among the electorate like the mixed messages of
indecision.
You
have to know that letting Rizzo, Baez and Bryant go with nothing in
return puts you closer to Daniel Snyder than Joe Lacob and Peter
Guber, right?
Look.
The Cubs' organization is obviously very fond of David Ross. Do him a
favor and give him a chance. And
just imagine the hero worship if the Cubs could pluck one more title
from the MLB firmament.
Even if you do enable that contagion in the White House.
Even if you do enable that contagion in the White House.
No comments:
Post a Comment