Showing posts with label Profiling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Profiling. Show all posts

Sunday, June 3, 2018

...and the Other

Despite his occupation, Milwaukee Bucks guard Sterling Brown isn't that different from you and I. It was late. He was tired. He just wanted to pop into a Walgreen's for a couple of things and go home.

Given the hour and the empty parking lot, Brown yielded to temptation and slid his car into a 'Handicapped Only' parking space. He would just be a minute. It being 2 AM on a cold winter night, who was he realistically preventing from using the space?

Fortunately, the Milwaukee Police Department knew better.

The first officer to respond, after asking Brown how he was doing, requests to see his driver's license. The officer continues to advance towards Brown, yet curiously asks Brown to back-up as he places a hand on Brown and appears to lightly push him.

As Brown digs in his pockets, he asks the officer not to touch him. There is cross talk. The officer (later identified as Sgt. Jeffrey S. Krueger), voice rising, asks Brown again “You don't see the issue here?”

Brown doesn't deny that he's illegally parked. He acknowledges the accusations, saying “That's cool, that's cool”. As he hands Krueger his license, the officer radios for assistance and again asks Brown to back-up.

It is impossible to know what distance separates the two men. Judging from a video, it appears to be two or three feet. Nevertheless, Krueger again asks Brown to back-up.

Brown, clearly feeling sufficient space separates the two men, asks “For what?”

Krueger asks incredulously “Are you obstructing me?” The tension is mounting. Krueger again asks Brown to back-up. Brown extends his arms in frustration. “I ain't doing nothing.”

Krueger again asks Brown to back-up. Brown says “I just did.”

After a back-and-forth over who touched who first, Krueger aggressively asserts his alpha-male status as a police officer, saying “I'll do what I want, alright? I own this right here.”

Brown replies “You don't own me, though.”

The encounter is degenerating into a territorial struggle.

At the one-minute mark, there is at last a reference to the driver's license. Krueger asks for Brown's name twice.

It's on there” replies Brown. “Sterling Brown.”

Krueger, again irritated, says ”I'm asking you.”

Equally irritated, Brown responds “I'm telling you. Sterling Brown.”

Krueger barks at Brown. “These are simple questions, man.” He accuses Brown of coping an attitude. Of using a fake name. Of possessing a fake ID. Of being threatening. Of trying to hide something.

Brown is frustrated that Krueger doesn't believe him.

They again return to the topic of who touched who first and who did or didn't back up. It is a child-like exchange befitting two boys in middle-school.

At the one-minute and fifty-second mark, Krueger again makes the point that Brown is illegally parked, asking “Can you explain this to me?”

For the second time Brown admits his guilt, adding he was “in and out” after Kruger oddly questions how long Brown's car was illegally parked.

I freely admit to being ignorant in the finer points of Milwaukee's handicapped parking statutes, but is being illegally parked for ten-minutes really a lesser crime than being illegally parked for fifty-minutes?

Because my experience (yes, again I have some) it's like being pregnant. You are or you aren't. Has a meter maid or police officer ever inquired of someone how long they were illegally parked before issuing a ticket?

Nope.

With another squad car approaching, Krueger answers Brown's question of what's next with a cryptic “We're going to wait.”

Brown is illegally parked and has freely admitted such. Krueger is cop, with a computer and presumably fully-loaded printer in his squad car. Why isn't Krueger asking Brown to return to his vehicle while he checks for outstanding warrants and writes-up a ticket?

This is where the interaction goes wholly and irretrievably wrong. This is where the Titanic meets the iceberg.

When Brown questions the delay, the now-relaxed Krueger says enigmatically “We're just going to figure it out, man.”

Brown correctly questions what else needs to be figured out before the ticket-writing can commence. Kruger tells him “We're going to figure out what we're going to do. Whether you're going to get tickets...(ominous pause) whatever.”

As a young black man, he seems to instinctively fear the 'whatever'. Brown asks one more question. “You can't do that by yourself?”

It is his last.

Another squad car enters the lot. Police radio chatter is heard. There is a cut in the video. An onscreen message says only that more officers have arrived. Brown is now surrounded by at least five Milwaukee police officers.

One of them yells for Brown to take his hands out of his pockets. When he doesn't immediately comply, they rush him. Brown is wrestled to the ground. There is much jostling. Visually, the bodycam reveals very little.

This because Krueger appears to be standing back from the fray.

The audio isn't much better.

Amid the jostling, one of the cops seemingly suggests using a taser on Brown. Seconds later, another one appears to urgently request it, shouting “Taser! Taser! Taser!” (This might also be a warning that one was about to be employed.)

In either case, the next sound we hear is Brown, groaning. He is obviously in great pain.

The video again fast forwards. Krueger is heard recounting the incident to another officer. He says he wondered whether Brown was in the middle of a medical emergency. If that wasn't the reason he was illegally parked.

He mentions speaking to a third-party about the illegally-parked car. He then claims that the minute Brown exited the store, he was a threat to Krueger. Chillingly, he adds offhandedly “Same thing as before.”

Wow. We can all be grateful we weren't in Sgt. Krueger's path that night.

For six-figure salaries and generous pensions that kick in after a mere twenty-years, we ought to expect a whole lot more from our police than capricious, race-based bullying.

Yes, Brown could have been more servile. And yes, Sgt. Krueger was clearly having a bad day. But the fact remains: there was no reason whatsoever for tasering Sterling Brown.

None.

It was, and is, indefensible.

This is textbook. You want to know why African-Americans don't trust the police? You want to know why Colin Kaepernick (who ironically was born in Milwaukee) has, in all likelihood, sacrificed his NFL career protesting this?

It's right here, ladies and gentlemen.

Sterling Brown—despite cooperating with police and admitting guilt—was gang-tackled, tasered and treated like a gang-banging thug because he is black.

There is no other reasonable conclusion.

Yes, big-city cops have tough jobs. But in addition to be being very well-paid to perform them, they are also officers of the peace; entrusted with de-escalating and defusing potentially volatile situations that threaten the public safety.

I didn't see any defusing. And I certainly didn't see any de-escalation. And I doubt you did, either. I saw a pissed-off cop spoiling for a fight—but only after five of his buddies showed up to stack the odds in his favor.

I have spent the majority of my working life with the public. And across several different jobs with several different employers, there is one constant: don't take it personally. If the last customer was abusive and accusatory, flush it out of your system. Move on.

Never, ever take it with you.

Sgt. Krueger was plainly unable to do so.

It is an outrage that he and his fellow gang members haven't been suspended without pay. They desperately need extensive time-off to examine the baggage they brought to this stop.

And while Sterling Brown is clearly the victim Rose Campbell imagines herself to be. I would offer him—in the gentlest words possible—this advice: next time, remain silent and obey.

You knew you were not a threat. Sgt. Krueger did not. Let him find his way to that truth.

And if he doesn't, there are avenues in which to seek justice.

In the end, what is most ironic is that despite all the chest-thumping and the challenging and the accusations, Brown never got that ticket.

It obviously wasn't a priority.

One Side of the Coin

I still can't wrap my brain around the uproar surrounding Alpharetta, GA. police officers, who first pulled over and then arrested a sixty-five year-old African-American grandmother after she failed to comply with their requests to A. sign her citation and B. step out of her car after refusing to do so.

Granted, she was pulled over for a “minor” offense: that of failing to maintain her lane. But in our DUI-centric society, where it often seems that is the only crime an individual can commit, veering outside your lane is clue number-one to law enforcement that you're impaired.

Especially when it happens after sundown.

Rose Campbell—presumably being sober—had only to sit patiently, let the officer explain why she was being pulled over and hope that said officer, seeing that she was, in fact, sober, would let her off with a warning.

But she couldn't.

Campbell also couldn't ask “Why do I need to sign this?”, the better to learn that doing so merely acknowledges being pulled over for a traffic violation, and that if she wished to contest the ticket she could do so in court.

While I have not spoken to her personally about this incident, I am going to assume Campbell felt this was a textbook case of profiling—pulling someone over not necessarily because of what they did, but for who they were when they did it.

And sadly, she let that dictate the remainder of the encounter.

Campbell was childish. Campbell was petulant. Campbell screamed like a toddler told to finish their peas—or else forego their screen time. And after telling the arresting officer she wouldn't get out of her car until his supervisor came on scene, she refused to do so then as well.

I would have lost my temper, too. I would have dragged this sixty-five year-old brat out of her car and told her to shut the fuck up, too. Campbell's behavior was a disgrace. She soiled every legitimate claim of police profiling and police brutality out there.

Yes, being pulled over sucks. Is there anyone who enjoys having their vehicular miscues amplified by the flashing LED lights of a police car—in public?

Nope.

But it happens. And when it does, we have to be the amazing people we tell everyone we are on Facebook and Instagram.

Cops are stressed. I'm pretty sure they don't enjoy pulling people over. I'm pretty sure they wonder who the hell they've stopped, and whether a sawed-off shotgun awaits them as they approach the driver's-side window.

But as someone who has been pulled over for far-less serious infractions than failing to maintain my lane, my advice is this:

1. Shut-up. Let the officer do their job. Hand over your license and registration. Don't act like you're two days overdue for a hit of meth. Ask questions using your indoor voice. You don't like being screamed at, do you? Neither do cops.

2. Acknowledge reality. You were in a hurry to get to your job because you left the house ten-minutes late. And on the day you have to give an 8 AM PowerPoint presentation on the reasons behind your employer's declining market-share.

You hate your job. And PowerPoint. You were a whole 'nother kind of DWI—driving while irritable. It's 7:35 and you're still thirty minutes away from work. Your boss is going to be chewing on your ass all day long, aren't they?

We all have bad days. We screw up. And sometimes, we're caught.

Clench.

Again, be the towering monument to self-control you say you are on social media. (The thought being that a ticket is a whole lot better than being forcibly inserted into the back of a squad car.)

And remember: contrary to what our media often implies, traffic stops are survivable.

And speaking of our media (especially the electronic kind who can't resist airing a controversial video because it's good for business), shame on them for validating Campbell's behavior. Shame on them for painting her not as a spoiled and entitled exception whose mistakes should remain immune from prosecution because of her race, but as a doting grandmother and frail diabetic.

In other words, a hapless victim of wanton police brutality.

Retch.

Let's be very, very clear: Rose Campbell is not Rosa Parks. She is a driver who momentarily let her concentration lapse and then had a great, big hissy fit when she got caught.

As Campbell herself later stated in an interview “Everyone does it.”

You would be correct, Rose. And that is why distracted driving is a topic of national concern—except when you do it. Because you're special and even when law enforcement has a valid reason for pulling you over—they don't.

Do I have that right?

Upon hearing that Campbell is, like me, a professional driver, I would urge her to consider a career change. Perhaps to something in the field of landscaping.

Because abetted by our short-sighted media, she has a remarkable ability for turning molehills into mountains.

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Profiling

Liberals are upset that proposed security measures for people boarding flights in the Middle East will subject them to ‘profiling’. In other words, these policies could victimize Middle Eastern populations by making them the objects of racism.

One-hundred percent of airplane-related terrorist acts have originated in the Middle East. Yet applying more-stringent security measures there and no where else is racist. Is that correct?

Presumably, the answer is to apply our boundless financial and physical resources equally throughout the globe, if only to avoid the appearance of profiling. Heighten our presence in al Qaeda hot spots like New Zealand, Mongolia and Switzerland.

Okay. Got it. And yes, I’d like fries with that.

If a woman has her purse ripped from her shoulder by a male of a certain appearance, is she sexist or racist if she holds her purse a little tighter when approached by individuals matching the description of the thief, or is she a sentient human being applying the knowledge of experience?

If a store clerk apprehends half-a-dozen people for shoplifting, is he biased if he watches people matching their description more-closely, or is he applying what he has learned through past events?

Terrorism and war are ugly. They are humanity at its worst. Life's sad constant. But to suggest we're racist in our pursuit of a threat that originates in a specific part of the world amongst a specific population is insane.

And in 1944, I suppose these same critics would have pursued Nazis in Bangladesh.

Please. Spare me.

There’s enough genuine racism in the world. We don't need to manufacture it.